Scope & deliverables
Does the proposal name the exact outputs—not only the intention?
Free · Private · No signup
A software proposal can look polished and still leave the most expensive decisions undefined. This check finds the gaps while both sides can still fix them.
Paste at least 80 characters · 80 more needed. Nothing is uploaded.
01 Scope
02 Price
03 Acceptance
04 Payment
05 Proof
A software proposal analyzer checks whether a quote clearly defines its deliverables, price structure, timeline, milestones, acceptance criteria, ownership, change process, support, and payment terms.
What gets checked
A missing term does not automatically make a proposal bad. It means both sides should define it before work or payment begins.
Does the proposal name the exact outputs—not only the intention?
Can each payment event be connected to defined progress?
Is “done” observable, testable, and explicitly approved?
Is there a commercial path for work outside the agreed scope?
Are code, credentials, licensing, and access rights clear?
What happens when delivery or acceptance is contested?
Questions, answered
Not from structure alone. This beta exposes what must be clarified before two prices can be compared. A price benchmark should appear only when enough genuinely comparable, verified deals exist.
Yes. The first browser-based structure check is free during beta. Any future transaction or subscription feature will be shown before you commit.
This version runs locally in your browser. Your pasted text is not submitted by the analyzer. A future opt-in workflow will explain exactly what is stored before anything leaves the browser.
No. It is an informational structure and ambiguity check, not legal, tax, financial, or procurement advice.